The Reasons Why Interactive Whiteboards Are Being Attacked
Interactive whiteboards, or IWBs, have significantly changed the way teachers and students communicate, collaborate, and share ideas in the classroom. However, these devices have also become the subject of criticism and attacks from different angles. In this article, we explore the main reasons why interactive whiteboards are being attacked and discuss their relevance in today's digital age.
1. High Cost
One of the primary reasons why interactive whiteboards are being attacked is their cost. These devices are expensive to purchase and install, and require additional resources such as projectors, computer systems, and software. As a result, some critics argue that the cost of IWBs outweighs their benefits, especially in an era where technology is constantly evolving and becoming more affordable.
While it is true that IWBs are a significant investment for schools and teachers, their advantages surpass their costs. IWBs help create an interactive and engaging learning environment, facilitate collaborative learning, and enhance teachers' ability to differentiate instruction according to students' needs. Moreover, they can be used across different subject areas and age groups, which makes them a versatile and valuable educational tool.
2. Technical Difficulties
Another point of criticism directed towards interactive whiteboards is their technical difficulties. Many teachers and students report that they experience frequent problems when using IWBs, such as calibration issues, disconnections, and software glitches. These issues can be frustrating, time-consuming, and detract from the overall learning experience.
However, it is important to note that technical difficulties are not exclusive to IWBs and can occur with any type of technology. Moreover, many of these issues can be addressed through proper training and maintenance. Teachers who are well-versed in the use of IWBs and receive adequate support from their IT teams are less likely to experience technical difficulties and can maximize the benefits of these devices.
3. Lack of Customization
Some critics argue that interactive whiteboards lack customization options and do not cater to individual learning styles and preferences. They contend that IWBs offer a one-size-fits-all approach and do not allow for personalization and differentiation.
While it is true that IWBs have some limitations in terms of customization, they still offer significant flexibility and adaptability. Teachers can customize their lessons by incorporating various multimedia resources, adjusting the size and placement of different elements, and modifying the pace and style of delivery. Moreover, many IWB software programs offer built-in features for differentiation, such as interactive quizzes, games, and manipulatives. Therefore, with proper planning and preparation, teachers can make the most of IWBs and cater to different learning styles and preferences.
4. Limited Interactivity
Another criticism directed towards interactive whiteboards is their limited interactivity. Critics argue that IWBs can turn passive learners into active learners, but they do not promote true interactivity and collaboration. They contend that IWBs still rely on traditional teaching methods, where students are expected to listen and follow the teacher's lead, rather than engage in their own learning processes.
While it is true that IWBs do not guarantee instant collaboration and interactivity, they do provide a platform for creating such experiences. Moreover, the extent of interactivity largely depends on the teacher's pedagogical approach and the use of additional resources. Teachers who incorporate group work, discussions, and debates in their lessons can use IWBs as a tool to facilitate collaboration and idea-sharing. Furthermore, IWBs can be used to connect students with other classrooms or schools through virtual field trips, videoconferencing, and other forms of digital communication.
5. Obsolescence
Lastly, some critics argue that interactive whiteboards are becoming obsolete and irrelevant in today's fast-paced digital age. They contend that IWBs rely on outdated technology and are being replaced by more immersive and versatile devices such as laptops, tablets, and smartphones.
While it is true that technology is constantly evolving, IWBs still have considerable value and relevance in the classroom. They provide a large and clear display that is visible to all students, facilitate real-time collaboration and feedback, and allow for the integration of different multimedia resources. Moreover, IWBs can be used in conjunction with other devices, such as tablets and smartphones, to leverage the advantages of multiple technologies. Therefore, IWBs are not becoming obsolete but rather evolving and adapting along with other technologies.
In conclusion, interactive whiteboards have become a significant tool in modern classrooms, but they are not without criticism and attacks. Their high cost, technical difficulties, limited customization, and perceived lack of interactivity and relevance are some of the main reasons why IWBs are being challenged. However, many of these criticisms can be addressed through proper training, maintenance, and pedagogical approaches. Therefore, interactive whiteboards remain a valuable and versatile technology that can enhance teaching and learning in the digital age.