Is Reinstating The Draft Such a Bad Idea?


The idea of reinstating a military draft in the United States has been a topic of discussion for several decades. In recent years, calls for its reinstatement have been fueled by a variety of factors including rising tensions with North Korea, China and Russia, increasing demands on the US military to fight multiple wars simultaneously and declining number of volunteers enlisting in the military.

The draft, also known as conscription, is a compulsory enlistment of people into military service. It was first implemented during the American Civil War, and later applied during World War I and World War II. The last time the United States used the draft was during the Vietnam War era in the 1960s and early 1970s, which saw protests against the draft and escalated into numerous social conflicts. Thus, the potential reinstatement of the draft in the US has led to a great deal of controversy, with both supporters and opponents weighing in on the issue.

One of the arguments in favor of reinstating the draft is that the US military is overstretched and that it does not have enough troops to fight multiple wars simultaneously. Advocates suggest that conscription could help address this issue by providing additional troops to supplement volunteer forces. This argument was put forth by retired general Stanley McChrystal, who stated that “I think if we’re going to fight a protracted, peer-to-peer, nation-state kinda war, we’re going to need a draft again.”

Another argument for reinstating the draft is that it would promote greater equity in society. Proponents argue that the current system, in which only a small percentage of the population serve in the military, creates a disproportionate burden on these individuals and their families. Critics contend that the current system is unfair and that conscription would create a more equitable distribution of the burden of military service.

On the other hand, opponents of the draft argue that it is an infringement on personal freedom and liberty. They see conscription as a violation of individual rights, and argue that individuals should have the right to choose whether or not they serve in the military. Opponents argue that the US Constitution explicitly grants the right to freedom of choice and that conscription violates this basic right.

Another argument against the draft is that it is inefficient and ineffective. Critics suggest that conscripted soldiers are usually not as well-trained or motivated as those who volunteer, and that conscription could lead to a decline in military readiness. Furthermore, conscription could lead to a general demoralization of the military, as soldiers would be fighting against their will rather than out of a sense of duty or commitment.

Another issue with the draft is that it could disproportionately burden certain communities and groups. The impact of conscription would not be equally distributed across society, as individuals from lower-income families and minority communities are more likely to volunteer for military service than those from more affluent backgrounds. Furthermore, individuals who are not eligible for military service, such as those with disabilities, would be exempt from the draft, creating further disparities and inequities within society.

There is also the issue of cost. The cost of a draft would be significantly higher than an all-volunteer force, as it would require a massive expansion of government infrastructure to support it. This would include facilities for training and lodging, transportation, and equipment. With the US already facing significant budget deficits and public debt, it is unclear whether it would be fiscally responsible to invest in such a system.

In conclusion, the debate over whether or not to reinstate the draft in the United States is a complex one. While advocates point to the potential benefits of an expanded military, greater equity and a more robust national defense, opponents argue that conscription would erode individual freedoms and rights, create inefficiencies and inequities and be fiscally irresponsible. Ultimately, the decision to reinstate the draft will likely depend on a wide variety of political, economic, and social factors, as well as public opinion and the will of the government.